ArticleJMIR formative research2026
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Related to AI in Learning and Research Among Medical Students in Vietnam: Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has ushered in a promising era in medicine, particularly in medical education. However, studies assessing the knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to AI among medical students in Vietnam remain limited. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate AI knowledge, attitudes, and practices among Vietnamese medical students in learning and research, and to identify factors associated with their AI practices. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among medical students at Thai Binh University of Medicine and Pharmacy from November to December 2025. Data were collected using an online structured questionnaire covering demographic characteristics and AI knowledge, attitudes, and practices. The main outcome of interest was AI practices in learning and research. Descriptive statistics and multivariable linear regression were used to examine associated factors. Regression coefficients (β), 95% CIs, and P values are reported. Results: A total of 1002 medical students (mean age 21.00, IQR 19.00-23.00 years; n=596, 59.5% female) were included. The median percentage of maximum possible (POMP) score of AI knowledge was 66.67 (IQR 33.33-83.33), with a high level of familiarity with common tools (n=798, 79.6%). AI attitudes were generally positive (median POMP score 70.00, IQR 53.33-76.67). AI-related practices were lower (median POMP score 50.00, IQR 46.88-71.88), with AI being used primarily for information retrieval and literature research support. In the multivariable analysis, knowledge POMP score (β=0.12, 95% CI 0.08-0.16) and attitudes POMP score (β=0.42, 95% CI 0.34-0.51) were significantly associated with AI practices POMP score (P<.001). Age, gender, major, grade point average classification, and having participated in an AI seminar or training were not associated with AI practices. Conclusions: Medical students showed favorable knowledge and positive attitudes, but their AI practices remained limited. Integrating AI into medical curricula, including fundamentals, applications, and ethical aspects, is essential to prepare future physicians for AI-driven health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.