ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2026
Epidemiology and treatment trends of retinopathy of prematurity: a multi-center study involving four Asian centers and one European center (2016-2023).
Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate regional differences in the epidemiology and treatment of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) from 2016 to 2023. STUDY
designRetrospective multicenter cohort study
methodsPremature infants screened for ROP at a single tertiary referral center in each of five countries/regions (Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, India, and Portugal) during the study period. Demographic characteristics, incidences of ROP and type 1 ROP, and treatment modalities were analyzed. Screening criteria followed local protocols. Logistic regression was used to assess trends, and intergroup comparisons were performed using Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests.
resultsA total of 15,031 premature infants were enrolled. Demographics varied significantly (p <0.001); India had the highest gestational age and birth weight, and the lowest proportion of very low birth weight and extremely low birth weight infants with type 1 ROP (p <0.001). Hong Kong had the lowest ROP incidence, while Singapore showed a significant increase over time (p = 0.003). Type 1 ROP rates were higher in Taiwan and India than in Hong Kong and Singapore, with a significant decline observed only in Taiwan (p = 0.005). Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (Anti-VEGF) injections were increasingly preferred as initial treatment, with bevacizumab being the most frequently used (87.3%).
conclusionFrom 2016 to 2023, ROP incidence and treatment showed significant regional differences. ROP increased in Singapore, while type 1 ROP decreased significantly in Taiwan. Although anti-VEGF therapy has become more common, laser treatment remains dominant in Hong Kong.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42397665What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.