ArticleCognitive processing2026
The STEARC effect revisited: does time shape spatial attention and memory?
Article in Cognitive processing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Numbers and time are closely linked to space. Two key effects illustrate this: the SNARC effect, associating smaller numbers with the left visual field and larger ones with the right, and the STEARC effect, linking the past to the left and the future to the right visual fields. This study examined whether time influences visual-spatial attention and memory by affecting attention shifts toward relevant visual fields and facilitating memory retrieval. To investigate this, we employed four experimental tasks: the SNARC task, the STEARC task, the visual-spatial attention task, and the visual-spatial memory task. In the SNARC task, participants pressed a key to determine whether the presented numbers were smaller or larger than 5. In the STEARC task, they assessed whether temporal words referred to the past or future. The SNARC and STEARC tasks confirmed number-space and time-space interactions, a necessary step before further investigation. During the visual-spatial attention task, participants responded to images presented in the left or right visual field following temporal reference words. We employed a single-key procedure for responses to eliminate any facilitation effects from response keys. In the visual-spatial memory task, participants indicated whether they had seen the images displayed previously. Our findings confirm the presence of the SNARC and STEARC effects. However, no detectable effect of temporal reference on visual-spatial attention was observed under the current task conditions. Similarly, no reliable effect was found in the visual-spatial memory task. Taken together, these findings suggest that temporal-spatial mappings may not be robustly observed in visual attention tasks that do not involve explicit left-right responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42397626What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.