ReviewMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2026
Expedited regulatory approval pathways for novel oncology drugs.
Review in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Expedited regulatory approval pathways are vital for providing timely patient access to novel therapies in oncology and other serious conditions. The traditional drug development pathway can take significant time, substantial costs (often more than ten years), and has a relatively low success rate. Programs such as the FDA's Accelerated Approval and Breakthrough Therapy, JP-PMDA's Sakigake Designation and Conditional Early Approval, AU-TGA's Priority Review and Provisional Approval, CDSCO's Accelerated Approval Mechanism and Emergency Use Authorization and the EMA's PRIME scheme, utilize mechanisms like rolling review and surrogate endpoints to accelerate development. The primary benefit of these pathways is significantly reducing the time to market for promising drugs, addressing critical unmet medical needs. However, this speed introduces challenges, including reliance on immature data from surrogate endpoints and frequent delays in completing mandatory confirmatory trials. Despite these limitations, expedited pathways have delivered important treatments for rare diseases like cancer, demonstrating their purpose as innovative accelerators. This review critically analyses the benefits, risks, and global variations of these pathways and provides recommendations to enhance their robustness, transparency, and international harmonization. To ensure that patients receive prudent, appropriate, and prompt treatments. This study concludes that a balanced strategy - integrating rigorous pre-market assessment with robust, enforced post-marketing surveillance - is essential to ensure these pathways deliver both rapid and beneficial patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42397619What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.