ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
ESD-VesNet: uncertainty-aware vessel segmentation network for endoscopic submucosal dissection with hard negative mining.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePreventing intraoperative bleeding in endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) relies on the timely identification and pre-coagulation of submucosal vessels. We aim to reduce bleeding risk by delivering accurate vessel segmentation with uncertainty awareness.
methodsWe present ESD-VesNet, a prompt-free SAM3-based framework with an evidential head that outputs vessel probability and pixel-wise uncertainty. The model is trained in a false-positive-aware manner using our developed ESD-Vessel dataset, which includes 2401 positives (images with clear vessel annotation) and 708 curated hard negatives (images may be confused with vessels), combined with online uncertainty-guided hard negative mining. The model is trained in a false-positive-aware manner using the ESD-Vessel dataset, which includes 2401 positive samples (images with clear vessel annotations) and 708 curated hard negatives (images visually confusable with vessels), combined with online uncertainty-guided hard negative mining. By suppressing false positive predictions, our approach has the potential to minimize unnecessary interventions, such as unwarranted coagulation.
resultsOn the validation set, ESD-VesNet achieves Dice
conclusionIntegrating SAM3 with evidential uncertainty and hard negative mining yields a clinically oriented vessel segmentation system that maintains high detection sensitivity with low false positives, supporting safer ESD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42397609What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.