ArticleArchives of toxicology2026
Scientific approach to derive occupational exposure limits for formaldehyde releasers.
Article in Archives of toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Formaldehyde is highly reactive, causing irritation and acute and chronic toxicity in target tissues (the eyes, respiratory tract, and skin) following inhalation and/or skin contact. Moreover, formaldehyde is a local carcinogen after inhalation exposure. It induces nasal squamous cell carcinoma in laboratory animals and nasopharyngeal carcinoma in humans, albeit less convincingly. While formaldehyde has been evaluated and classified by different organizations and committees in recent years, the question has arisen of how to deal with substances that release formaldehyde. These releasers decompose in aqueous media and are frequently used as biocides in water-miscible metalworking fluids, adhesives, paints, disinfectants, and cosmetics. In this context, the MAK Commission has developed a concept for differential evaluation regarding carcinogen classification and MAK value derivation. This approach is based on hydrolysis rates as a function of pH, temperature, and concentration under physiological conditions. Furthermore, vapor pressure is considered to determine whether the formaldehyde releaser will be present as a vapor or aerosol upon inhalation. This concept is demonstrated using four examples that lead to different carcinogen classifications and MAK value derivations. Additionally, the releasers were evaluated for percutaneous absorption and sensitization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42397578What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.