Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42397573›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Outcomes after surgical resection of spinal ependymomas: extent of resection, imaging phenotype, and survival.

Berkay Paker, Önder Ertem, Mehmetzeki Yıldız, Türker Kılıç, Deniz Konya

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Berkay PakerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Eğitim Ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Istanbul, Turkey. berkaypkr@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1823-8530
Önder ErtemDepartment of Neurosurgery, Bahçeşehir University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mehmetzeki YıldızAcıbadem Altunizade Hospital, Türkiye, Istanbul, Turkey.
Türker KılıçDepartment of Neurosurgery, Istinye University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Deniz KonyaAcıbadem Altunizade Hospital, Türkiye, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo characterize functional recovery, imaging phenotype, and survival in surgically treated spinal ependymomas and to explore clinicopathological and radiologic correlates of postoperative course.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 48 consecutive patients (55 surgical procedures) with pathologically confirmed spinal ependymoma, including both intramedullary and intradural-extramedullary/filum lesions. Collected variables included demographics, tumor location and MRI phenotype (axial position, cyst formation, syrinx, cord edema, enhancement), extent of resection, pathological subtype/grade, Ki-67, complications, recurrence/progression, and follow-up. Functional outcomes were assessed pre- and postoperatively using the modified McCormick Scale (mMCS) and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS). Kaplan-Meier methods estimated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with log-rank comparisons; univariable Cox models (cluster-robust for repeated procedures) estimated hazard ratios (HR). Because numerous exploratory comparisons were performed, p-values were corrected with the Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery rate.

resultsMean age was 37.8 ± 14.5 years; 62.5% were male. Tumors were most commonly cervical (43.6%) and lumbar (38.2%); 56.4% were intramedullary and 43.6% extramedullary. Pathology included WHO grade 2 ependymoma (63.6%), myxopapillary ependymoma (29.1%), and WHO grade 3 ependymoma (7.3%). Gross-total resection (GTR) was achieved in 85.5% of procedures. Complications occurred in 9.1% and recurrence/progression in 23.6%; median follow-up was 22 months (mean 31.2 ± 28.8). KPS improved significantly (p < 0.001), whereas mMCS did not (p = 0.25), and no between-group differences in ΔmMCS/ΔKPS reached significance. Three- and five-year PFS were 84% and 78%, and OS 94% and 88%. In univariable analyses, subtotal resection was associated with shorter PFS (HR 3.7, 95% CI 1.5-9.7) and a similar trend for OS (HR 4.7; p = 0.06); WHO grade 3 (HR 5.7) and Ki-67 > 3% (PFS HR 3.7; OS HR 7.2) were associated with worse outcomes. After false-discovery-rate correction, only pathological subtype remained significant; earlier associations of syrinx and anatomical level with PFS were not confirmed. Intramedullary and extramedullary tumors did not differ significantly in PFS or OS.

conclusionsPostoperative gains were more consistently captured by KPS than mMCS. Maximal safe resection remains central to tumor control and survival, while MRI phenotype and Ki-67 may provide additional, hypothesis-generating prognostic context for surveillance planning.

Indexed as

Extent of resectionIntramedullary spinal cord tumorKarnofsky Performance StatusModified McCormick ScaleProgression-free survivalSpinal ependymoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.