ArticleSurgery today2026
A learning curve analysis of resident-performed laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair and the impact of the operative interval.
Article in Surgery today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLaparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (TAPP) is useful for resident training. However, the association between the operative interval and skill acquisition remains unclear. We evaluated the learning curve of resident-performed TAPP and explored the association between the operative interval and operative time changes.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 67 consecutive TAPP cases performed by a single surgical resident. A cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was based on the adjusted operative time, with bilateral cases weighted by 0.6. Breakpoints were estimated using segmented regression, and the relationship between the operative interval and the change in adjusted operative time between consecutive cases (ΔTime) was assessed using exploratory analyses.
resultsA CUSUM analysis estimated breakpoints at 16.0 (95% CI, 13.7-18.3) and 38.1 (95% CI, 36.5-39.7) cases. BMI showed a weak negative correlation with operative duration. The adjusted operative time decreased across the learning, proficiency, and competency phases. Exploratory LOESS curves suggested a possible non-linear relationship between operative interval and ΔTime, with 8-14-day intervals showing a tendency toward a greater reduction during early phases. However, the differences among the interval groups were not significant.
conclusionResident-performed TAPP exhibited a three-phase learning curve. Case selection and operative interval may be associated with operative time changes, although these findings remain exploratory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42397562What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.