Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42397542›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2026

From information to action: how medical reports can support general practitioners in long-term cancer care-a qualitative exploratory study.

Sandra Salm, Astrid-Alexandra Klein, Teresa Halbsguth, Karen Voigt, Karola Mergenthal, Corina Güthlin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sandra SalmInstitute of General Practice, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany. salm@allgemeinmedizin.uni-frankfurt.de.
Astrid-Alexandra KleinDepartment of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Teresa HalbsguthDepartment of Medicine II, Hematology/Oncology, Goethe University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Karen VoigtDepartment of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Karola MergenthalInstitute of General Practice, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.
Corina GüthlinInstitute of General Practice, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGeneral practitioners (GPs) are central to the lifelong care of cancer survivors, yet it remains unclear which information needs they have regarding the content and format of oncological medical reports. This study explores which information GPs require and how they interpret and use this information to provide long-term cancer care in the context of German primary care.

methodsWe conducted an exploratory qualitative study using a multi-method approach: semi-structured interviews with 14 GPs, a think-aloud interview with an oncologist during report drafting, and a workshop with six GPs and one oncologist. Data were analyzed using a content-based summarizing approach.

resultsGPs emphasized that information on performed treatments, current diagnostic findings (including excluded diagnoses), and the specific information shared with the long-term cancer survivor are highly relevant. To effectively implement the information from medical reports in care provision, prioritized risks of late effects, and clear recommendations for further care are needed. Structured presentation of information, such as bullet points or tables, was perceived as supporting interpretation and use of information.

conclusionsStructured and prioritized medical reports support GPs in their role as coordinators and providers of long-term cancer care. Such reports have the potential to improve the continuity and quality of care for long-term cancer survivors by bridging oncology and primary care. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Survivors benefit from better-informed GPs who can provide consistent counseling and management of long-term and late effects. Clearer communication between other specialists and GPs reduces the risk of fragmented care and ensures that long-term survivorship needs are addressed holistically within the primary care setting.

Indexed as

Cancer survivorshipFollow-up careInformation useMedical reportsPrimary careQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID42397542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.