ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2026
From information to action: how medical reports can support general practitioners in long-term cancer care-a qualitative exploratory study.
Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeGeneral practitioners (GPs) are central to the lifelong care of cancer survivors, yet it remains unclear which information needs they have regarding the content and format of oncological medical reports. This study explores which information GPs require and how they interpret and use this information to provide long-term cancer care in the context of German primary care.
methodsWe conducted an exploratory qualitative study using a multi-method approach: semi-structured interviews with 14 GPs, a think-aloud interview with an oncologist during report drafting, and a workshop with six GPs and one oncologist. Data were analyzed using a content-based summarizing approach.
resultsGPs emphasized that information on performed treatments, current diagnostic findings (including excluded diagnoses), and the specific information shared with the long-term cancer survivor are highly relevant. To effectively implement the information from medical reports in care provision, prioritized risks of late effects, and clear recommendations for further care are needed. Structured presentation of information, such as bullet points or tables, was perceived as supporting interpretation and use of information.
conclusionsStructured and prioritized medical reports support GPs in their role as coordinators and providers of long-term cancer care. Such reports have the potential to improve the continuity and quality of care for long-term cancer survivors by bridging oncology and primary care. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Survivors benefit from better-informed GPs who can provide consistent counseling and management of long-term and late effects. Clearer communication between other specialists and GPs reduces the risk of fragmented care and ensures that long-term survivorship needs are addressed holistically within the primary care setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42397542What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.