Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42397519›Full record

ArticleIrish journal of medical science2026

Time since cigarette smoking cessation and self-rated health among exclusive e-cigarette users.

Yusuff Adebayo Adebisi, Anas Ali Alhur

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yusuff Adebayo AdebisiCollege of Social Sciences, University of Glasgow, 40 Bute Gardens, Glasgow, G12 8RT, UK. y.adebisi.1@research.gla.ac.uk.
Anas Ali AlhurDepartment of Health Informatics, College of Public Health and Health Informatics, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundE-cigarettes are increasingly used as smoking cessation aids, yet population-level evidence on whether health status improves with time since smoking cessation among exclusive e-cigarette users remains limited. This study examined the association between time since cigarette smoking cessation and self-rated health among current e-cigarette users who were former smokers in Scotland and further explored whether duration of current e-cigarette use was associated with self-rated health within this group.

methodsA pooled cross-sectional analysis was conducted using seven waves of the Scottish Health Survey (2017-2024, excluding 2020). The analytic sample comprised 5,064 adults: 3,722 current cigarette smokers who were not currently vaping (reference group) and 1,342 current e-cigarette users who were former smokers, categorised by time since cessation (< 1 year, 1 to < 5 years, and ≥ 5 years). The outcome was self-rated health, measured on a five-category ordinal scale from very good to very bad. Associations were estimated using survey design-adjusted ordered logistic regression, adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, area deprivation, limiting long-standing illness, and survey year. A secondary analysis restricted to current e-cigarette users who were former smokers examined time since cessation alone and, in a supplementary joint model, additionally included duration of current e-cigarette use (< 1 year, 1 to < 3 years, and ≥ 3 years).

resultsIn the fully adjusted main model, current e-cigarette users who had quit smoking 1 to < 5 years earlier (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.96; p = 0.016) and ≥ 5 years earlier (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.64-0.89; p = 0.001) had significantly lower odds of reporting worse self-rated health compared with current smokers. In the secondary analysis restricted to current e-cigarette users who were former smokers, there was no evidence that self-rated health differed by time since smoking cessation, using those who had quit < 1 year earlier as the reference group (1 to < 5 years vs. <1 year: OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.69-1.29; ≥5 years vs. <1 year: OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.68-1.30). After adding duration of current e-cigarette use in the exploratory supplementary joint model restricted to current e-cigarette users who were former smokers, time since smoking cessation remained non-significant. However, vaping for ≥ 3 years, compared with < 1 year, was associated with lower odds of worse self-rated health (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.38-0.93; p = 0.022).

conclusionsExclusive e-cigarette users who were former smokers reported better self-rated health than current smokers, but self-rated health did not vary clearly by time since smoking cessation within the e-cigarette-user group. Longer vaping duration showed an exploratory association with better perceived health. Longitudinal studies are needed to clarify whether these patterns reflect changes after smoking cessation, selection effects, or both.

Indexed as

E-cigarettesElectronic nicotine delivery systemsSelf-rated healthSmoking cessation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.