Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42397517›Full record

ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2026

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials: low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (Li-ESWT) for erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy.

Zhongbao Zhou, Zhuoqi Cheng, Guangzhu Wei, Yong Zhang

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhongbao Zhou *Department of Urology, Beijing TianTan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhuoqi Cheng *Department of Internal Medicine 3, Rheumatology and Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Guangzhu WeiDepartment of Urology, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yong ZhangDepartment of Urology, Beijing TianTan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. doctorzhangyong2@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe efficacy of Low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (Li-ESWT) for erectile dysfunction (ED) in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) remains poorly recognized. To address this, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effectiveness of this intervention.

methodsFrom January 2000 to May 2025, five RCTs were selected, involving a total of 297 patients from PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to evaluate the efficacy of Li-ESWT for ED in patients undergoing RP.

resultsAt the 8- and 12-week assessments following Li-ESWT, participants who underwent Li-ESWT demonstrated significantly greater improvements in IIEF scores compared with those in the control group (8-week: MD 2.80, P < 0.0001; 12-week: MD 2.10, P = 0.004). In contrast, no significant differences in IIEF scores were detected between the Li-ESWT and control groups at 24 weeks and beyond post-treatment.

conclusionLi-ESWT significantly improves short-term erectile function in patients following RP. However, this therapeutic benefit was not sustained beyond 24 weeks. Accordingly, further research is warranted to investigate novel strategies and combination therapies aimed at preserving long-term erectile function after RP.

Indexed as

Erectile dysfunctionLow-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapyMeta-analysisRadical prostatectomyRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.