ArticleCell and tissue banking2026
Effectiveness of PRF alone versus PRF plus biphasic calcium phosphate as a scaffold for gingival mesenchymal stem cells in induced vertical alveolar ridge defects.
Article in Cell and tissue banking, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research evaluated the effectiveness of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) membrane alone versus the combined use of PRF membrane and biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) block as a scaffold for gingival mensenchymal stem cells (GMSCs) in treatment of induced vertical alveolar ridge defects. Three standardized saddle-type defects were created in 10 adult mongrel dogs. Following a 4-week recuperation period, the defects were randomly assigned to one of three groups based on the treatment protocol: group I: defects augmented with only PRF membranes loaded with GMSCs, group II: treated with a combination of PRF membranes loaded with GMSCs and BCP block, and group III: treated with PRF membranes not loaded with GMSCs in addition to BCP block. After four months of augmentation procedures, histological and histochemical examinations were done. Two dogs were excluded from the study, resulting in a total sample size of 8 mongrel dogs. The data were statistically examined. Group II had the largest amount of bone growth inside the defect. However, evidence of bone maturation was more visible in group I. The difference in bone formation inside the defect between groups I and II was not statistically significant (P = 0.3395). However, there were significant differences between groups I and III and groups II and III (P < 0.0001). Histomorphometry revealed that group II had the highest mean area percentage of bone matrix, whereas group III had the lowest mean value. In conclusion, the combination of PRF loaded with MSCs and BCP block is a promising therapy option for vertical alveolar ridge defects in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42397435What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.