ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2026
Single-center longitudinal experience with MRgLITT in pediatric neurosurgery: technical evolution, expanding indications, and advanced MRI-driven planning.
Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Laser interstitial thermal therapy in pediatric neurosurgery: a prospective nationwide study on indications, safety, and early outcomes.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this study is to evaluate the 6-year clinical and technological evolution of MR-guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (MRgLITT) in a pediatric and young adult cohort. We specifically analyze the paradigm shift from "rescue therapy" to a "first-line" intervention for complex, deep-seated lesions, enabled by the transition from manual stereotaxis to robotic and intraoperative MRI-guided workflows. The primary objective was to evaluate how technological evolution influenced safety in high-risk anatomical targets.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 63 procedures performed on 57 patients (mean age 12.1 years, range 1.8-28.6). The series was stratified into three technological phases: Phase I (manual frameless), Phase II (robotic-assisted), and Phase III (intraoperative 3T MRI guidance system). The cohort highlights a progressive inclusion of high-risk targets, with a focus on anatomical distribution and pathological subtypes.
resultsThe surgical indications included brain tumors (n = 42; 66.7%), epileptogenic lesions and tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) (n = 12; 19%), and cavernous malformations (n = 9; 14.3%). High-risk targets constituted more than half of the series: thalamic (n = 19, 30.2%) and posterior fossa (n = 13, 20.6%) lesions. Six patients (10.5%) underwent multiple procedures, showcasing LITT's versatility as a staged strategy for complex tumors or recurrences. Despite the significant shift toward high-risk targets, zero symptomatic trajectory-related complications or hemorrhages were observed (0%), confirming the safety of robotic and intra-MRI guidance. The overall local control rate for tumors was 71.4%. Engel Class I seizure outcome was achieved in 58.3% of epilepsy patients and in 70% of the combined epilepsy/cavernoma cohort. Permanent thermal-related morbidity was 3.2% (2/63): one hearing loss and one visual field deficit. Transient deficits (7.9%) were resolved within 3 months. No significant difference in safety was found between lobar and deep-seated/infratentorial targets (p > 0.05).
conclusionsThe integration of robotic precision and 3T real-time monitoring has lowered procedural risks, allowing MRgLITT to progressively emerge as a first-line option in selected complex cases (thalamic and infratentorial) previously considered high-risk or inaccessible. The low permanent morbidity rate (3.2%) confirms the safety of this technological evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42397424What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.