ReviewJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2026
Dopamine supersensitivity psychosis: a critical evaluation of diagnostic validators.
Review in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dopamine antagonists are the cornerstone of treatment for psychotic disorders, but long-term exposure may induce dopamine supersensitivity psychosis (DSP)-a syndrome characterized by psychotic relapse upon dose reduction or discontinuation, tolerance to antipsychotic effects, and co-occurrence of tardive dyskinesia. Despite decades of clinical observation and supporting preclinical evidence, the diagnostic validity of DSP and its relationship to treatment resistance remain incompletely understood. This systematized review evaluates clinical evidence supporting DSP as a distinct diagnostic entity using the standard framework of psychiatric diagnostic validators: delineation from other disorders, predictable clinical course, predictable treatment response, reliable biomarkers, and genetic susceptibility. A systematic search of MEDLINE and Embase identified 39 eligible clinical studies comprising case series, cross-sectional studies, cohort studies, and randomized controlled trials. Methodological quality was assessed using the Murad tool for case series and Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists for remaining designs. Data were synthesized qualitatively due to heterogeneity in study designs, diagnostic criteria, and outcome measures. Evidence suggests predictable symptom worsening following dose reduction or switching to partial agonists, and points toward possible genetic susceptibility variants. Biomarker findings remain inconclusive, and differentiation of DSP from natural illness relapse is inherently difficult. Retrospective designs, small samples, absence of control groups, and inadequate confounder control preclude definitive conclusions. Standardized diagnostic criteria and prospective, well-controlled studies integrating clinical, genetic, and biomarker assessments are urgently needed to clarify the existence, mechanisms, and optimal management of DSP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42397413What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.