Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42397413›Full record

ReviewJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2026

Dopamine supersensitivity psychosis: a critical evaluation of diagnostic validators.

Liam Korošec Hudnik, Ivo Kosmačin, Milica Pjevac, Vita Dolžan, Jurij Bon

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Liam Korošec HudnikUniversity Psychiatric Clinic Ljubljana, Chengdujska 45, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia. liam.hudnik@psih-klinika.si.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-6997-1158
Ivo KosmačinUniversity Psychiatric Clinic Ljubljana, Chengdujska 45, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Milica PjevacUniversity Psychiatric Clinic Ljubljana, Chengdujska 45, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-8581-2840
Vita DolžanPharmacogenetics Laboratory, Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Vrazov trg 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Jurij BonUniversity Psychiatric Clinic Ljubljana, Chengdujska 45, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5303-2044

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dopamine antagonists are the cornerstone of treatment for psychotic disorders, but long-term exposure may induce dopamine supersensitivity psychosis (DSP)-a syndrome characterized by psychotic relapse upon dose reduction or discontinuation, tolerance to antipsychotic effects, and co-occurrence of tardive dyskinesia. Despite decades of clinical observation and supporting preclinical evidence, the diagnostic validity of DSP and its relationship to treatment resistance remain incompletely understood. This systematized review evaluates clinical evidence supporting DSP as a distinct diagnostic entity using the standard framework of psychiatric diagnostic validators: delineation from other disorders, predictable clinical course, predictable treatment response, reliable biomarkers, and genetic susceptibility. A systematic search of MEDLINE and Embase identified 39 eligible clinical studies comprising case series, cross-sectional studies, cohort studies, and randomized controlled trials. Methodological quality was assessed using the Murad tool for case series and Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklists for remaining designs. Data were synthesized qualitatively due to heterogeneity in study designs, diagnostic criteria, and outcome measures. Evidence suggests predictable symptom worsening following dose reduction or switching to partial agonists, and points toward possible genetic susceptibility variants. Biomarker findings remain inconclusive, and differentiation of DSP from natural illness relapse is inherently difficult. Retrospective designs, small samples, absence of control groups, and inadequate confounder control preclude definitive conclusions. Standardized diagnostic criteria and prospective, well-controlled studies integrating clinical, genetic, and biomarker assessments are urgently needed to clarify the existence, mechanisms, and optimal management of DSP.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic withdrawalDopamine D2 receptorDopamine supersensitivity psychosisRebound psychosisTreatment-resistant schizophrenia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.