Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42397157›Full record

ArticleFEMS microbiology ecology2026

Host-selective PMA-PCR enhances bacterial diversity recovery and lowers detection limits in plant microbiome profiling.

Anatolijs Bervjačonoks, Antonija Rimša, Ivars Anspoks, Ance Roga, Megija Luņģe, Dita Gudrā, Anitra Zīle, Elza Kaktiņa, Jevgenija Ņečajeva, Davids Fridmanis and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anatolijs BervjačonoksInstitute of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Latvia, Riga, LV-1004, Latvia.
Antonija RimšaInstitute of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Latvia, Riga, LV-1004, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0003-1463-8446
Ivars AnspoksInstitute of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Latvia, Riga, LV-1004, Latvia.
Ance RogaMolecular ecology and biosystems department, Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Riga, LV-1067, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0003-4683-7458
Megija LuņģeMolecular ecology and biosystems department, Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Riga, LV-1067, Latvia.
Dita GudrāMolecular ecology and biosystems department, Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Riga, LV-1067, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-9446-4521
Anitra ZīleInstitute of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Latvia, Riga, LV-1004, Latvia.ORCID 0009-0006-1392-8977
Elza KaktiņaInstitute of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Latvia, Riga, LV-1004, Latvia.ORCID 0009-0008-5745-6160
Jevgenija ŅečajevaInstitute of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Latvia, Riga, LV-1004, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-0828-9721
Davids FridmanisMolecular ecology and biosystems department, Latvian Biomedical Research and Study Centre, Riga, LV-1067, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0003-0310-0448
Anete BorodušķeInstitute of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Latvia, Riga, LV-1004, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0003-0077-9811

Funding

Latvian Council of Science lzp-2022/1-0179
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Co-amplification of host DNA remains a significant obstacle in plant microbiome profiling, as universal taxonomic markers, such as the 16S rRNA gene, are also present in plant organellar genomes. While strategies like blocking primers can enrich bacterial reads, they rely on prior sequence knowledge and may introduce bias. We developed a sequence-independent approach that suppresses host DNA amplification by combining physical pretreatments that selectively compromise plant cell integrity with propidium monoazide (PMA) treatment, which binds exposed DNA and prevents its PCR amplification. We observed that various pretreatments-including cryopreservation and mechanical disruption enhanced plant cell susceptibility to PMA without affecting bacterial cells. The applied approach resulted in significantly increased proportions of bacterial reads and improved detection of bacterial diversity in downstream NGS. Compared to sequence-dependent strategies such as blocking primers, this method achieved comparable or superior performance in reducing host DNA interference-particularly in low-biomass samples. Our results establish cryopreservation-enhanced PMA-PCR as a robust, sequence-independent method for high-resolution plant microbiome profiling.

Indexed as

AzidesBacteriaMicrobiotaPlantsPolymerase Chain ReactionPropidiumBiodiversityDNA, BacterialDNA, PlantRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAzidesDNA, BacterialDNA, PlantPropidiumpropidium monoazideRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sco-amplificationhost DNA suppressionplant microbiomePMA-PCRpropidium monoazide

Identifiers

PMID42397157
PMCPMC13355530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.