ArticleeLife2026
Navigating the path: Advice to physician-scientists on choosing a clinical specialty.
Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Choosing a clinical specialty is a critical decision for physician-scientist trainees, influencing both clinical practice and research trajectory. This article provides a structured approach to specialty selection, emphasizing the importance of aligning clinical interests with long-term research goals, evaluating training pathways, and considering lifestyle implications. Physician-scientists, including MD-PhD and other dual-degree graduates, as well as MD graduates with research-intensive training, often pursue specialties with established research pathways. We outline key decision-making factors, including mentorship, clinical exposure, research commitment, and financial sustainability. Additionally, we compare research track and categorical residency pathways, detailing differences in training structure, funding opportunities, and career outcomes. The article explores the evolving role of physician-scientists across career stages, from residency through senior faculty leadership, highlighting strategies to maintain research engagement while balancing clinical responsibilities. By critically evaluating these factors and leveraging mentorship and institutional support, physician-scientists can make informed decisions that align with their aspirations, ensuring a fulfilling and impactful career in both medicine and research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.