ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026
A Simple, Dynamic Geometric Phantom for MRI and CT Reconstruction Pipelines: Beyond Shepp-Logan.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A customizable, dynamic geometric phantom was developed to bridge the gap between simplistic static phantoms and highly realistic, complex 4D solutions. The phantom enables initial testing, helps detect implementation errors, and supports quantitative evaluation of new dynamic acquisition and reconstruction methods. It is formed from a series of superellipsoids using the constructive solid geometry technique and serves as a schematic representation of a human torso, including the lungs, liver, and stomach, as well as a four-chamber heart, major vessels, and simplified skeletal structures. This design allows full parameterization of voxel intensities and organ volumes. Respiratory and cardiac motions are modeled using built-in, decoupled signal generators. A high-performance, open-source reference implementation was developed in Julia and is available both as a library and a standalone console application. The phantom's capabilities were demonstrated through four experiments. The difference between the input and measured lung volumes was quantified, yielding a maximum relative error of 5.5% and a median error of 2.5%. The relative error of the cardiac chamber volumes ranged from 1.76% to 3.67%. Performance was benchmarked across multiple phantom sizes and thread counts, and a realistic Cartesian MRI simulation demonstrated how the phantom can be used to quantify motion blur and artifacts. The proposed dynamic geometric phantom provides an intermediate option between simple static phantoms and complex, proprietary, anatomically realistic 4D models. It provides a highly customizable, easy-to-use, open-source tool for researchers developing new reconstruction algorithms, and it can be easily integrated into existing reconstruction pipelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.