ArticleJournal of proteome research2026
Molecular Solution to the Paradox of Ancient Brain Preservation.
Article in Journal of proteome research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Molecular Solution to the Paradox of Ancient Brain Preservation.Journal of proteome research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Brains decompose rapidly after death yet frequently survive in the archeological record, including >1300 cases of waterlogged, oxygen-poor graves in which the brain is the only preserved soft tissue amongst otherwise skeletonized remains. To address this paradox, we decayed mouse carcasses for six months in four burial regimes varying in water and oxygen availability, characterized the brain proteome by high-resolution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry using parallel data-dependent and -independent acquisition workflows at six post-mortem intervals, and modeled >1.26 million peptide-specific decay trajectories to identify decay-prone and -resistant sequences. Oxygen availability exerted the main control on molecular fate: oxic burials produced widespread protein loss, whereas wet, hypoxic conditions favored retention of a distinctive subset of decay-resistant peptides. These surviving sequences were structurally ordered, enriched in redox-active residues and in regions that bind metals and lipids, and bore modification patterns consistent with radical-mediated oxidative cross-linking rather than fragmentation. By linking intrinsic tissue chemistry and environmental context, our results move brain preservation from anomaly to expectation: resolving why brains outlast other soft tissues in waterlogged, oxygen-poor burials, and revealing that the molecular signatures of post-mortem peptide persistence closely mirror those of pathological protein stabilization in brain aging and neurodegeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.