ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2026
Enhanced Time-Locked Decoding for Spoken Words but Not Environmental Sounds in Natural-Like Auditory Conditions.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhanced Time-Locked Decoding for Spoken Words but Not Environmental Sounds in Natural-Like Auditory Conditions.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Humans are especially sensitive to speech sounds even in complex acoustic environments, but it remains unclear whether speech is tracked differently from other meaningful sounds under such conditions. Magnetoencephalography recordings combined with machine learning have revealed that dynamic time-locking of cortical activation to unfolding speech is crucial for encoding its acoustic-phonetic features. Here we investigated whether a similar mechanism for speech encoding operates during concurrent processing of speech and nonspeech sounds. Twenty participants listened to superimposed spoken words and nonspeech environmental sounds while attending to one stream at a time. Using a time-locked decoding model, we reconstructed time-varying acoustic characteristics of attended and ignored sounds from neural responses in each hemisphere. In the left hemisphere, amplitude envelopes of attended spoken words were decoded significantly better than those of attended environmental sounds at 120- to 200-ms latency between the sound and the cortical activation. No such difference between sound types emerged in the right hemisphere. Furthermore, attention significantly enhanced the decoding of speech sounds in the left hemisphere, suggesting that the observed effects reflect both bottom-up and top-down driven processes. These findings imply that particularly the left hemisphere processes speech sounds in a special, time-locked manner even under adverse auditory conditions. This mechanism may share its neural underpinnings with the previously reported time-locked tracking of speech amplitude envelope by cortical oscillatory activation or by evoked responses to acoustic edges, supporting efficient extraction of speech features in natural-like listening conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.