ReviewMolecular medicine reports2026
Proteolysis‑targeting chimeras in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Current evidence, translational challenges and future directions (Review).
Review in Molecular medicine reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) poses a significant clinical challenge due to its high recurrence rate, resistance to treatment and the functional morbidity associated with current therapies. Although proteolysis‑targeting chimeras (PROTACs) have emerged as a promising oncological platform, their application in oral cancer remains in the early stages, largely supported by preclinical data. The present review reconsiders PROTAC development from an OSCC‑specific perspective, rather than a generalized cross‑cancer framework. Key findings directly relevant to OSCC/head and neck squamous cell carcinoma are highlighted, distinguishing them from hypotheses extrapolated from other solid tumors. Biologically validated candidate targets for protein degradation are summarized, and delivery strategies are evaluated for their translational relevance to the oral cavity. Local transmucosal delivery, stimuli‑responsive activation and microneedle‑assisted locoregional administration are particularly promising for OSCC, as these approaches may enhance local selectivity while minimizing systemic exposure. This review also assesses the current clinical validation of the degrader platform in other malignancies, noting that these results should be interpreted as platform‑level evidence, not as oral cancer‑specific conclusions. Finally, major barriers to translation in OSCC are outlined, including inadequate disease‑specific target validation, delivery challenges, on‑target/off‑tumor toxicity and the lack of clinically relevant preclinical models. In conclusion, PROTACs offer a promising, though still nascent, therapeutic framework for OSCC, with future advancements reliant on biomarker‑guided target prioritization, oral‑cavity‑specific delivery optimization and dedicated translational research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.