Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42396617›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental and molecular mutagenesis2026

Evaluating the Suitability of HepaRG Cells for Regulatory Micronucleus Testing: Comparing Results for a Diverse Set of 28 Chemicals to Regulatory Accepted TK6 Cells.

Ashley Allemang, Stefan Pfuhler

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental and molecular mutagenesis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. New Approach Methods in Genetic Toxicology.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ashley AllemangGlobal Product Stewardship, The Procter & Gamble Company, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6799-8675
Stefan PfuhlerGlobal Product Stewardship, The Procter & Gamble Company, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8869-5975

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing interest in in vitro-based new approach methodologies (NAMs) for assessing genotoxicity. These approaches are desirable for industries like cosmetics which are prohibited from animal testing due to regulatory restrictions, as well as "3R" considerations to avoid in vivo testing. One NAM is the adaptation of the in vitro micronucleus assay for metabolically competent human hepatic HepaRG cells. However, per OECD Test Guideline 487, the use of non-validated cell types such as these needs to be justified based on their proficiency in the assay. To this end, we have tested 28 chemicals in HepaRG and TK6 human lymphoblast cells, a standard cell line considered validated for use in the in vitro micronucleus assay. HepaRG cells showed a high overall accuracy of 86%, compared to 75% for TK6 cells across a balanced set of expected in vivo positives and negatives across various genotoxic modes of action. The improved overall performance of HepaRG cells was predominantly based on their lower susceptibility towards compounds known to cause "false positive" responses (positive results in vitro, but are known to be negative in vivo), particularly those related to oxidative stress as demonstrated by the ToxTracker assay. The study indicates a high predictive capacity of HepaRG cells, suggesting that with further examination of chemicals requiring metabolic activation, they may be suitable for regulatory testing. These findings advocate for the incorporation of HepaRG cells into genotoxicity assessment frameworks, providing a more human-relevant approach that has the potential to improve risk assessment outcomes.

Indexed as

HepatocytesMutagensCell LineHumansLymphocytesMicronucleus TestsMutagensHepaRGin vitro micronucleusin vitro‐only risk assessmentToxTracker

Identifiers

PMID42396617
PMCPMC13329747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.