SynthesisJournal of neurochemistry2026
The Converging Effects of Different Categories of Antidepressants on the Brain: A Systematic Meta-Analysis of Public Transcriptional Profiling Data From the Hippocampus and Cortex.
Synthesis in Journal of neurochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Meta-Analysis of the Converging Effects of Different Classes of Antipsychotics on the Frontal Cortex Transcriptome in Laboratory Rodents and Non-Human Primates.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Depression can be treated with traditional pharmaceuticals targeting monoaminergic function, nontraditional drug classes and neuromodulatory interventions. To identify mechanisms of action shared across clinically-effective antidepressant treatment categories, we performed two systematic meta-analyses of public transcriptional profiling data from adult laboratory rodents (rats, mice). The outcome variable was gene expression, measured by microarray or RNA-Seq from bulk-dissected tissue from two depression-related brain regions (hippocampus, cortex). Relevant datasets were identified in the Gemma database of curated, reprocessed transcriptional profiling data using predefined search terms and inclusion/exclusion criteria (hippocampus: June 24, 2024, cortex: July 10, 2024). Differential expression results were extracted for all genes, minimizing bias. For each gene, a random effects meta-analysis model was fit to antidepressant vs. control effect sizes (Log2 Fold Changes) from each study for each brain region, with follow-up analyses exploring sources of effect heterogeneity. For the hippocampus, 15 relevant studies were identified, containing 22 antidepressant vs. control group comparisons (collective n = 313 samples), with approximately half representing traditional versus nontraditional antidepressants. Of 16 439 analyzed genes, 58 were consistently differentially expressed (False Discovery Rate (FDR) < 0.05) following treatment. Antidepressant effects were enriched in the dentate gyrus and in gene sets related to stress regulation, brain growth and plasticity, vasculature and glia, and immune function. Comparisons with single nucleus RNA-Seq confirmed effects on specific hippocampal cell types, including potential rejuvenation of dentate granule neurons. For the cortex, 13 studies were identified, containing 16 antidepressant vs. control group comparisons (collective n = 233 samples). Of 15 583 analyzed genes, only one was consistently differentially expressed (FDR < 0.05: Atp6v1b2), but overall expression patterns moderately resembled the hippocampus. These genes and pathways showing consistent differential expression across treatment categories may be promising targets for novel therapies. Future work should explore relevance to human clinical populations and potential heterogeneity introduced by sex and subregion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.