ArticleEcology and evolution2026
How to Account for Past Selection When Maternal Effects Are Cascading.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many forms of maternal effects are said to be 'cascading', in which an individual's phenotype is partially a function of its mother's phenotype. The mother's phenotype is also partially a function of the grandmother's phenotype, and so each individual phenotype depends on the phenotypes of all its previous maternal lineage ancestors. In previous work we developed quantitative genetics models to assess the evolutionary consequences of such cascading maternal effects under pragmatic modelling assumptions. Here we show that the theoretical framework underlying our previous studies should be extended to treat past maternal states as being under selection in the current generation to account more consistently for the cascading nature of phenotypic parental effects. While accommodating selection of past maternal states does not significantly change the qualitative results of our previous studies, we find typically small quantitative changes in the evolving genetic components, offspring phenotype and fitness. The extended framework offers a conceptually more consistent approach that can inform future quantitative genetics models of parental effects. In particular this new formulation captures the impact of genetic covariances between current and past states on the evolutionary dynamics, and provides a flexible framework that can be adapted to analyse transgenerational influences from any combination of ancestors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.