Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42396561›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2026

Epigenetic plasticity and chemoresistance in cancer: mechanisms, biomarkers, and translational opportunities for real-world evidence.

Cadiele Oliana Reichert, Nélio Cézar de Aquino, Vinícius de Camargo Callefi, Isadora Alves, Sofia Cattena, Emanuelle Rocha Santos, Ketelyn Aparecida Deamo Vasconcelos, Hebert Fabricio Culler, Luis Alberto de Pádua Covas Lage, Vanderson Rocha and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Cadiele Oliana ReichertLaboratory of Medical Investigation in Pathogenesis and Directed Therapy in Onco-Immuno-Hematology (LIM-31), Department of Hematology, Hemotherapy and Cell Therapy - Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FM-USP), SãoPaulo, Brazil.
Nélio Cézar de AquinoLaboratory of Medical Investigation in Pathogenesis and Directed Therapy in Onco-Immuno-Hematology (LIM-31), Department of Hematology, Hemotherapy and Cell Therapy - Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FM-USP), SãoPaulo, Brazil.
Vinícius de Camargo CallefiLaboratory of Medical Investigation in Pathogenesis and Directed Therapy in Onco-Immuno-Hematology (LIM-31), Department of Hematology, Hemotherapy and Cell Therapy - Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FM-USP), SãoPaulo, Brazil.
Isadora AlvesLaboratory of Medical Investigation in Pathogenesis and Directed Therapy in Onco-Immuno-Hematology (LIM-31), Department of Hematology, Hemotherapy and Cell Therapy - Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FM-USP), SãoPaulo, Brazil.
Sofia CattenaLaboratory of Medical Investigation in Pathogenesis and Directed Therapy in Onco-Immuno-Hematology (LIM-31), Department of Hematology, Hemotherapy and Cell Therapy - Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FM-USP), SãoPaulo, Brazil.
Emanuelle Rocha SantosLaboratory of Medical Investigation in Pathogenesis and Directed Therapy in Onco-Immuno-Hematology (LIM-31), Department of Hematology, Hemotherapy and Cell Therapy - Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FM-USP), SãoPaulo, Brazil.
Ketelyn Aparecida Deamo VasconcelosLaboratory of Medical Investigation in Pathogenesis and Directed Therapy in Onco-Immuno-Hematology (LIM-31), Department of Hematology, Hemotherapy and Cell Therapy - Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FM-USP), SãoPaulo, Brazil.
Hebert Fabricio CullerLaboratory of Medical Investigation in Pathogenesis and Directed Therapy in Onco-Immuno-Hematology (LIM-31), Department of Hematology, Hemotherapy and Cell Therapy - Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FM-USP), SãoPaulo, Brazil.
Luis Alberto de Pádua Covas LageLaboratory of Medical Investigation in Pathogenesis and Directed Therapy in Onco-Immuno-Hematology (LIM-31), Department of Hematology, Hemotherapy and Cell Therapy - Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FM-USP), SãoPaulo, Brazil.
Vanderson RochaLaboratory of Medical Investigation in Pathogenesis and Directed Therapy in Onco-Immuno-Hematology (LIM-31), Department of Hematology, Hemotherapy and Cell Therapy - Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FM-USP), SãoPaulo, Brazil.
Adriana Castello Costa GirardiLaboratory of Renal Physiology and Cardiometabolism, Department of Cardiopneumology, University of São Paulo (FMUSP), SãoPaulo, Brazil.
Carlos Alejandro Murga-ZamalloaDepartment of Pathology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Juliana PereiraLaboratory of Medical Investigation in Pathogenesis and Directed Therapy in Onco-Immuno-Hematology (LIM-31), Department of Hematology, Hemotherapy and Cell Therapy - Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FM-USP), SãoPaulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemoresistance remains a major barrier to durable cancer control and is increasingly understood as a dynamic process shaped not only by genetic selection, but also by epigenetically regulated changes in cellular state. Evidence supports a model in which a subset of tumor cells survives treatment through drug-tolerant persister states characterized by slow cycling, stress tolerance, transcriptional rewiring, and altered interactions with the tumor microenvironment. In this context, chromatin remodeling, histone-state regulation, chromatin accessibility, enhancer reprogramming, and lineage plasticity emerge as central mechanisms enabling adaptive survival under therapeutic pressure and facilitating transition toward more stable resistant phenotypes. These mechanisms also provide a biological rationale for epigenetic therapies as priming, combination, or resensitization strategies. Clinical and translational studies suggest that targeting epigenetic regulators may help restore treatment susceptibility, although current evidence remains heterogeneous, with variable regimens, endpoints, and biomarker sampling strategies. Epigenomic biomarkers may therefore be particularly valuable for identifying adaptive cell states, monitoring target engagement, and tracking resistant trajectories over time. Real-world data and real-world evidence can complement mechanistic and clinical studies by capturing treatment sequencing, heterogeneous populations, and post-approval effectiveness and safety patterns. However, their translational value depends on fit-for-purpose design, analytical validity, transparent provenance, and bias-aware methods, particularly in sequential treatment settings prone to confounding, endpoint misclassification, and non-random molecular testing. In this mini-review, we examine how epigenetic plasticity drives chemoresistance and how epigenomic biomarkers and real-world data may support clinical research and more rigorous evidence generation.

Indexed as

chemoresistanceDNA methylationepigenetic therapyepigenomicsreal-world evidence

Identifiers

PMID42396561
PMCPMC13323500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.