ArticleResearch square2026
Somatosensory cortex shapes perceptual decision bias via the superior colliculus.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sensory inputs reach cortical and subcortical areas in parallel, but how they coordinate to guide decisions is not well understood. Here, we examined primary somatosensory cortex (S1) and superior colliculus (SC) in mice performing a tactile detection task. Inactivating S1 contralateral to the stimulus decreased the detection probability as expected. Surprisingly, inactivating ipsilateral S1 increased detection probability, even when the stimulus was absent. These opposite effects reflected shifts in choice bias, rather than changes in sensitivity. SC inactivation produced similar directional bias shifts, and SC lesions abolished the effects of S1 inactivation. Neural recordings showed that although S1 inactivation decreased SC sensory responses, choice-activity remained robust in SC, but fell to chance in S1, suggesting that behavioral impairment was better explained by changes in SC-dependent choice signals rather than the loss of S1 sensory encoding. Thus, S1 shapes tactile behavior by modulating SC-dependent circuits that help transform sensory evidence into a decision.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.