ArticleResearch square2026
Pedestrian Collision Detection and Avoidance in Cerebral Visual Impairment During Unrestricted Walking in an Immersive Virtual Reality Environment.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Walking safely through highly crowded environments is a significant challenge for individuals with cerebral visual impairment (CVI). Yet current ophthalmic examinations do not capture functional visual difficulties related to safe mobility. We developed an immersive virtual reality (VR)-based task that tracked eye gaze behaviors within dynamic areas of interest to assess pedestrian collision detection, avoidance, and associated visual scanning in CVI (n=12) compared to control (n=14) participants. Subjects walked through a simulated shopping mall populated with crowds of varying densities. The testing scenario was presented using a head-mounted display with integrated eye tracking, and locomotor, behavioral, and visual scanning responses were recorded. Compared to controls, CVI participants exhibited a slower mean preferred walking speed. They were also less likely and slower to detect target (colliding) pedestrians and were more likely to make a collision. CVI participants were also slower in making their first fixation and followed a larger visual scan path to find the target pedestrian. They also spent more time fixating on non-target compared to target pedestrians. Finally, CVI participants showed greater variability in their performance (including pathing deviations), reflecting a range of individual strategies, and maintained a larger walking safety margin (spatio-temporal envelope). These results provide objective evidence of mobility and associated gaze behaviors in CVI during navigation through highly crowded environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.