Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42396503›Full record

ArticleResearch square2026

Tension, depression, and culture among women in rural Bangladesh: Continuity and change.

Lesley Jo Weaver, Fahmida Tofail, Alison Karasz

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lesley Jo WeaverUniversity of Oregon.
Fahmida TofailInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research.
Alison KaraszUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School.

Funding

ASHA Bangladesh--An Integrated Intervention to Address Depression in Low Income Rural WomenR01MH127577 · NIMH · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI KARASZ, ALISON, TOFAIL, FAHMIDA · 2021 to 2025
$2.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH127577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People's experiences of psychological distress can provide insight into broader social contradictions and divisions in societies. In Bangladesh, an ethnographic record dating back to the 1920s presents an opportunity to explore how those contradictions and divisions have changed or stayed the same in 100 years. This article draws on interviews with a group of 60 women with likely depression in rural Bangladesh to a) explain their distress, its causes, and its possibilities for resolution; and b) compare those experiences to the ethnographic record. Social institutions reflected in the literature, like dowry, patrilocality, and mobility restriction, were still key features of life for women in the study and were significant sources of distress in their everyday lives. On top of these "classic" stressors, newer stressors also surfaced from women's narratives, including debt to microlending programs and husbands' addictions to pharmaceuticals. Women articulated an awareness of emerging opportunities for girls and women in rural Bangladesh that did not exist a generation ago, such as pursuing education, marrying later, having smaller families, and working in a job. They hoped for their children to benefit from these new opportunities, but their aspirations were often thwarted by ongoing poverty and patriarchal norms that limited their life chances.

Indexed as

Bangladeshcommon mental disordersethnographyLMICruralwomen

Identifiers

PMID42396503
PMCPMC13321317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.