ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development
Students' Experiences of Presence and Learning Across Simulated and Virtual Patient Formats: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: While traditional medical education emphasizes real patient interactions, practical and ethical constraints require alternatives, such as simulated patients (SPs) or virtual patients (VPs) in virtual reality. This study investigates medical students' experiential perceptions across different simulation formats within the same undergraduate medical curriculum, using a newly developed modality-spanning questionnaire. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted with 486 medical students across four curricular courses with differing educational content and objectives (two SP-based and two VP-based courses). A study-specific questionnaire applicable across both simulation formats captured "experience of presence" ('embodiment', 'involvement', 'coherence') and "experience of learning" ('experience of competence', 'tension', 'acquisition of skills', 'enthusiasm'). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to examine internal structure and psychometric properties of the questionnaire. Results: Analyses indicated a stable internal structure with good sampling adequacy (Cronbach's α = 0.82 for "experience of presence" and α = 0.66 for "experience of learning"). While overall perceived learning did not differ between simulation formats, format-specific experiential profiles emerged. SPs were rated higher for "experience of presence", particularly regarding 'involvement' (M = 4.05 vs. 2.62), whereas VPs scored higher for 'coherence' (M = 4.50 vs. 3.98). Within learning-related dimensions, SPs were associated with greater 'tension' (M = 3.57 vs. 2.71) and 'acquisition of skills' (M = 4.66 vs. 4.24), while VPs elicited higher levels of 'enthusiasm' (M = 4.57 vs. 4.03; all p < 0.001). Conclusion: This study provides insights into how medical students experience presence and learning across different simulation formats within an authentic curricular setting. While SPs appear to foster emotional engagement and perceived skill acquisition, VPs may particularly support spatial orientation and motivational aspects. Applying a single questionnaire across content-diverse courses and modalities may support educators in strategically aligning simulation formats with specific educational objectives and guiding the targeted development of curricula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.