Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42396410›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Topological skeleton analysis for network-based shape representation in biology and beyond.

Allyson Quinn Ryan, Johannes Soltwedel, Carl D Modes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Allyson Quinn RyanMax Planck Institute for Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Pfotenhauerstraße 108, 01307 Dresden, Saxony, Germany.
Johannes SoltwedelDFG Cluster of Excellence 'Physics of Life', TU Dresden, Arnoldstraße 18, 01307 Dresden, Saxony, Germany.
Carl D ModesMax Planck Institute for Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Pfotenhauerstraße 108, 01307 Dresden, Saxony, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shape analysis and classification are popular methods for biologists, biophysicists, and mathematicians investigating relationships between function and form. Classic shape descriptors, such as sphericity, can be powerful but may be insufficient for more complex shapes. Here, we present "napari-toska" a topological skeleton-based method to analyze complex shapes by representing their asymmetries as networks. Using global neighborhood principles, classic network science metrics, and spatial feature embedding, we create instance segmentation object profiles for immediate or downstream classification. napari-toska also follows temporal dynamics and identifies network features that differentiate experimental phenotypes. We incorporated absolute spatial feature measurements of objects to retain aspects of scale. Furthermore, napari-toska identifies certain segmentation errors through the emergence or loss of network cycles. Combined, napari-toska functions allow for flexible and in-depth shape profiling of intricate shapes often observed in biological and physical settings where robust, yet precise, system configuration is essential to functionality.

Indexed as

Cell biologyNetwork topology

Identifiers

PMID42396410
PMCPMC13324304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.