ArticleiScience2026
Condition-specific neural signatures of reactivation during post-retrieval rest: An EEG study.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Memory reactivation mediates memory malleability, enabling memories to be updated or rendered susceptible to interference. Contemporary theories emphasize that reactivation outcomes depend on the degree and quality of neural reinstatement elicited by retrieval cues. Here, we analyzed how reminders with varying degrees of overlap with prior learning shape neural dynamics during the post-retrieval resting state period. Using electroencephalography (EEG), we compared cue (RX) and context (RCTX) reminders, which differ in their sensitivity to interference. Both reminders were associated with reductions in high beta-band power (25-40 Hz). An exploratory analysis of phase-synchronization network organization differentiated the two reminder types; the RCTX reminder, which was less similar to the original learning episode, showed increased frontal betweenness centrality, suggesting a prominent role for frontal regions in information transfer. Together, these findings identify high beta-band activity and network topology as signatures of post-retrieval neural states that differentiate between reminder types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.