Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42396373›Full record

ArticleClinical medicine insights. Case reports2026

Gastric Adenocarcinoma Missed at the Incisura Angularis During Initial Endoscopy: A Case Report.

Philippe Attieh, Bassem Derbas, Wael El Mustapha, Karam Karam, Elias Fiani

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical medicine insights. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Philippe AttiehDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Balamand, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8491-0790
Bassem DerbasDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Balamand, Beirut, Lebanon.
Wael El MustaphaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Balamand, Beirut, Lebanon.
Karam KaramDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Balamand, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1914-320X
Elias FianiDepartment of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Balamand, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3204-9098

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Gastric adenocarcinoma remains a major cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Early detection is crucial for improving prognosis; however, early lesions may be overlooked during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), particularly in anatomically challenging areas such as the incisura angularis. This region is considered a high-risk site for gastric neoplasia and may act as a blind spot during routine endoscopic evaluation. Case summary: A 38-year-old female with a history of chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease presented with worsening reflux symptoms, postprandial epigastric pain, and recurrent vomiting. Nine months prior, the patient had undergone an EGD for similar symptoms, which showed no significant abnormalities. Despite treatment with proton pump inhibitors, her symptoms progressively worsened and were accompanied by early satiety and an 8-kg unintentional weight loss. A repeat EGD was performed and revealed suspicious ulcerative lesions at the level of the incisura angularis. Multiple biopsies were obtained, and histopathological examination confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma. The patient was subsequently referred for multidisciplinary management and oncological evaluation. Conclusion: This case highlights the potential for gastric adenocarcinoma to be missed during initial endoscopic examination, particularly at the incisura angularis. Careful mucosal inspection and appropriate retroflexion during EGD are essential for improving lesion detection in this high-risk anatomical region.

Indexed as

case reportgastric adenocarcinomaincisura angularismissed adenocarcinoma

Identifiers

PMID42396373
PMCPMC13323661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.