ArticleInternational journal of applied & basic medical research
Diagnostic Accuracy of Ischemia-modified Albumin in Complicated Appendicitis and Its Comparison with the Conventional Markers: An Observational Study.
Article in International journal of applied & basic medical research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute appendicitis is a common emergency, with one-third presenting as complicated cases. Differentiating complicated appendicitis (CA) from uncomplicated appendicitis (UA) is important to decide on intervention. Conventional markers have limitations, while ischemia-modified albumin (IMA), released during ischemia and oxidative stress, may aid in diagnosis. This study evaluates the utility of IMA in distinguishing CA from UA. Materials and Methods: An observational cross-sectional study conducted in a tertiary care hospital on 85 patients over 13 years with acute appendicitis was further divided into CA ( Results: IMA levels were significantly higher in CA 10.90 ± 5.65 μg/mL compared to UA 6.00 ± 2.93 μg/mL ( Conclusion: IMA appears to be an ideal parameter to identify CA; however, larger multicentric studies are required to validate its clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.