Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42396353›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of applied & basic medical research

Integrating Reflective Competence into Medical Education: Preparing Indian Medical Graduates for Lifelong Learning.

Rajiv Mahajan, Shaista Saiyad, Amrit Virk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of applied & basic medical research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rajiv MahajanDepartment of Pharmacology, Adesh Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Bathinda, Punjab, India.
Shaista SaiyadDepartment of Physiology, Smt. NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Amrit VirkDepartment of Community Medicine, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar State Institute of Medical Sciences, Mohali, Punjab, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The conscious competence model is widely used in medical education; however, its final stage, unconscious competence, may lead to "arrested development," where practitioners cease reflective practice. In a rapidly evolving field like medicine, this lack of reflection risks outdated knowledge and compromised clinical care. This paper proposes a fifth stage, reflective competence, defined as mastery combined with continuous self-awareness and the ability to learn, unlearn, and relearn. Reflective competence is characterized by metacognition, critical thinking, and deliberate practice and represents an extension of existing frameworks such as Miller's pyramid and Dave's taxonomy by adding a dimension of professional identity and lifelong reflection. The competency-based undergraduate medical curriculum in India provides opportunities for its integration through early clinical exposure, self-directed learning, simulation-based training, and reflective logbooks. With structured mentoring, feedback, and assessment rubrics for reflection, these approaches can nurture reflective practitioners capable of adaptive expertise and lifelong learning. By positioning reflective competence as the fifth stage of the conscious competence model, this paper advances medical education theory and practice, offering a framework that ensures lifelong reflection, adaptive expertise, and professional identity formation as the true markers of mastery.

Indexed as

Competency-based curriculumcritical thinkingmedical educationmetacognitionreflective competenceunconscious competence

Identifiers

PMID42396353
PMCPMC13327384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.