Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42396350›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of applied & basic medical research

The Drainage Dilemma in Thyroid Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Necessity of Drain Following Thyroidectomy.

Toshikala Khiamn, Siddharth P Dubhashi, Divish Saxena

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of applied & basic medical research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Toshikala KhiamnDepartment of Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Siddharth P DubhashiDepartment of Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Divish SaxenaDepartment of Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Draining the thyroid bed after thyroid surgery is a matter of apprehension and anxiety for the operating surgeon rather than its necessity. This study aims to evaluate the evidence-based evaluation of the necessity of a drain following thyroidectomy. Materials and Methods: A randomized-controlled trial was conducted at a tertiary care center in Central India for 2 years with a sample size of 80 patients undergoing thyroidectomy, with 40 patients in both thyroidectomy with drain and thyroidectomy without drain group each. The postoperative protocol and standard of care were similar in both groups. The patients were assessed for pain, seroma formation, and wound infection on postoperative day 1, 3, and 5, and patient-rated satisfaction scoring was done using a 5-point Likert scoring. Results: The age distribution in both the groups was comparable with a mean age of presentation in Group A was 42.1 ± 11.6 years and for Group B was 43.4 ± 14.2 years. Patients with a drain experienced significantly more pain ( Conclusion: Drain placement after thyroid surgeries has no additional benefits in preventing postoperative risk of seroma/hematoma formation or occurrence of surgical site infection. Rather, the use of drains is usually associated with postoperative discomfort, increased length of hospital stays, and leaves an additional scar affecting overall esthetics for patients.

Indexed as

Cosmetic scardrainseromathyroid surgeries

Identifiers

PMID42396350
PMCPMC13327372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.