ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Integrated Clinicogenomic Risk Modeling for Metachronous Second Primary Cancers.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Improvements in cancer survival have increased the burden of subsequent primary malignancies. We developed and validated a programmatic classifier of multiple primary cancers (MPC) to derive second cancer phenotypes at scale. Among 81,175 cancer patients, we identified 56 first-second cancer pairs, 22 of which exceeded SEER primary cancer incidence rates. Even after accounting for various known risk factors, substantial elevated risk persisted, even in established hereditary cancer pairs (breast-ovary, breast-pancreas, prostate-pancreas), suggesting that current screening protocols do not adequately account for MPC susceptibility. To address this limitation, we built machine-learning models integrating rare germline variants, polygenic risk scores, treatment exposures, and demographic features to predict site-specific second primaries in breast and prostate cancer survivors. These models accurately predicted second ovarian and pancreatic cancers across a long follow-up period (15-year time-dependent AUC 0.70). This is the first systematic, pan-cancer integration of clinicogenomic factors for early prediction of secondprimary malignancies. Our framework enables individualized risk estimation, enhanced targeted surveillance, and cancer prevention amongst a growing population of cancer survivors.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.