ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
SWI and T2*-GRE Microhemorrhage Counts in Anti-Amyloid Therapy Eligibility: A Real-World-Calibrated Simulation Study.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAnti-amyloid therapy eligibility excludes patients with five or more cerebral microhemorrhages (CMHs), but current guidance allows either T2*-GRE or the more sensitive SWI. This may create sequence-dependent differences in eligibility classification.
methodsWe fitted a Bayesian right-censored zero-inflated Poisson model to single-center real-world SWI-based CMH counts from 130 memory clinic patients. We then simulated T2*-GRE counts under a directional binomial detection model across a range of relative detection probabilities and estimated two metrics:
resultsThe model estimated a zero-inflation probability of 0.57 and a Poisson mean of 2.29 in the susceptible subpopulation. In the illustrative 60% relative-detection scenario, the model estimated nearly 80% under-detection among SWI-ineligible patients, whereas approximately 5% of T2*-GRE-eligible patients would have been classified as ineligible by SWI. DISCUSSION: A uniform numeric CMH threshold may not be operationally equivalent across SWI and T2*-GRE. Standardized paired-sequence outcome studies are needed to determine whether SWI-defined and T2*-GRE-defined thresholds carry equivalent ARIA risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.