ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Emergency integrative supportive care program for frail patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: A prospective GERCOR ARCAD study.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (aPDAC) often experience general health decline at diagnosis due to a high-symptom burden. The optimal management of symptoms and/or poor performance status (PS) in these patients remains an unmet medical need. Patients and Methods: In this multicenter study, patients with PS≥2 and pathologically confirmed or imaging-suspected aPDAC were included at first oncology visit in a personalized 14-day emergency integrative supportive care program (14-EISCP) to manage pain, nutrition, diagnostics, and stenting procedures. The primary endpoint was the 14-EISCP success in feasibility of planned procedures and clinical benefit defined as post-EISCP PS≤1, ≥5 points improvement in fatigue, pain, global health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores (EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL), or chemotherapy initiation within 30 days. Results: A total of 106 patients were included; 93 evaluable patients considered for primary endpoint analysis (median age: 76 years [68-80], PS3: 20.9%, metastases: 61.3%). The median overall survival was 4.1 months (IC95% 2.6-5.6). The 14-EISCP was successful in 59.1% (n=55) of patients, meeting the primary objective (clinically relevant). The 14-EISCP feasibility was achieved in 70.9% of cases. Post-EISCP clinical benefit was observed in 79.6% of patients, with PS improvement to 0/1 in 13.2%, HRQoL improvement in 23.9%, and chemotherapy initiation ≤30 days in 73.1%. Among evaluable patients, 17.2% received mFOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine-nab-paclitaxel, 35.4% received FOLFOX, 25.3% had gemcitabine or 5-fluorouracil alone, and 22.2% received best supportive care. In patients with PS2 at baseline, the administration of doublet/triplet chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival compared to single-agent. Discussion: These results offer a promising framework for improving outcomes in aPDAC patients, bridging the gap between symptom management and systemic therapy administration. Conclusions: In patients with PS≥2 and aPDAC, the personalized 14-EISCP was feasible and lead to meaningful clinical benefit, allowing doublet or triplet chemotherapy in half the patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.