ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Dissecting the genetic architecture of knee alignment reveals its contribution to osteoarthritis risk.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the biological and clinical relevance of knee alignment in osteoarthritis by integrating population-scale imaging, genome-wide association, and functional genetic analyses. Methods: Femorotibial angle was derived from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans in UK Biobank using machine-learning methods. Associations with knee and hip osteoarthritis outcomes were assessed. A genome-wide association study of mean femorotibial angle was performed, followed by fine-mapping and pathway enrichment analyses. Mendelian randomization was used to explore potential causal relationships. Results: Varus alignment was strongly and progressively associated with knee pain, knee osteoarthritis, and total knee replacement (HR 3.42 [95% CI 2.92, 4.02]), with no association observed for hip osteoarthritis. GWAS identified 20 independent loci associated with femorotibial angle, enriched for pathways related to skeletal development, cartilage biology, and endochondral ossification. Post-GWAS analyses demonstrated regulatory effects across fetal and adult joint tissues, supporting life course influences on alignment. Genetic correlation analyses showed shared architecture between femorotibial angle and knee osteoarthritis. Causal analyses suggested that genetic liability to osteoarthritis reduces femorotibial angle (β -0.11 [-0.16, -0.06]), while evidence for an overall causal effect of femorotibial angle on osteoarthritis risk was limited (OR 0.93 [0.79, 1.10]). Conclusions: Knee alignment and susceptibility to knee osteoarthritis are partially genetically determined. At the population level, these genetic determinants support a causal effect of osteoarthritis on knee alignment, whereas evidence for a causal effect of alignment on knee osteoarthritis was limited. Furthermore, this study identifies novel genetic loci linking knee alignment with pathways involved in skeletal development and cartilage biology relevant to osteoarthritis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.