ArticleArchives of physiotherapy
Frontline agreement in diagnosis and treatment for musculoskeletal dysfunctions. A prospective, randomized, controlled study.
Article in Archives of physiotherapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Due to shortages of general practitioners and increasing emergency department (ED) presentations for non-urgent musculoskeletal conditions (MSKDs), Advanced Physiotherapy Practice (APP) roles have been implemented internationally. However, this model remains novel in Switzerland. This study evaluated agreement in diagnosis, treatment, and discharge decisions between physiotherapists and resident physicians compared with senior physicians as the reference standard in the ED of Bethesda Hospital Basel (BSAG). Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted from October to December 2023. Patients presenting musculoskeletal complaints without evidence of serious pathology were allocated to either an intervention group managed by physiotherapists or a control group receiving standard care by resident physicians. Clinical decisions from both groups were reviewed by senior physicians. Agreement was assessed using Cohen's Kappa (κ) and Gwet's AC1 statistics. Results: A total of 102 patients were included (mean age 52 years, SD 16.3; 61% female; 51% with low back pain). Physiotherapists demonstrated good to excellent agreement with senior physicians for diagnosis (κ = 0.72-0.96; AC1 = 0.73-0.97) and management (κ = 0.69-0.88; AC1 = 0.71-0.89). Residents showed high agreement for diagnosis (κ = 0.85; AC1 = 0.86) and perfect agreement for management (κ = 1.00; AC1 = 1.00). No adverse events occurred. Patient satisfaction was higher in the physiotherapy group (mean 4.79 vs. 4.19/5). Conclusion: Experienced physiotherapists demonstrated high agreement with senior physicians in diagnosing and managing MSKDs in the ED. APP appears safe and may improve patient satisfaction without increasing adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.