ArticleCase reports in ophthalmology
May Acute Appendicitis Complicate the Management of Pseudotumor Cerebri in Shunt-Dependent Patients? A Paediatric Case Report.
Article in Case reports in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Shunt-dependent secondary pseudotumor cerebri may remain clinically stable for many years; however, intra-abdominal sepsis such as perforated appendicitis can necessitate abrupt shunt removal, eliminating cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion and precipitating sudden, vision-threatening intracranial pressure (ICP) elevation. Case Presentation: A 17-year-old girl with a long-standing ventriculoperitoneal shunt for a childhood arachnoid cyst initially developed papilledema that was successfully managed with the addition of a lumboperitoneal shunt. Nine months later, she presented with perforated appendicitis requiring emergent appendectomy and removal of both shunts because of the high risk of ascending shunt infection. Although visual acuity was initially preserved after surgery, rapidly progressive bilateral papilledema developed within days, accompanied by marked retinal nerve fibre layer thickening and enlarging visual field defects despite maximal acetazolamide therapy. As reinstitution of CSF diversion was not feasible, bilateral optic nerve sheath fenestration (ONSF) was performed as a vision-preserving intervention. Visual acuity, visual fields, and papilledema improved promptly and subsequently normalised. Conclusion: Perforated appendicitis in shunt-dependent patients may precipitate abrupt, vision-threatening ICP elevation following unavoidable shunt removal. Abdominal pain in patients with a history of CSF diversion should raise immediate suspicion for intra-abdominal sepsis. Early recognition of appendicitis may prevent perforation-related shunt complications, and timely ONSF is critical to avert permanent optic nerve damage when CSF diversion cannot be promptly restored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.