ReviewAmerican heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice2026
From anatomy to vulnerability: A comprehensive appraisal of coronary physiology and plaque characterization.
Review in American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A substantial proportion of acute coronary syndromes arise from non-obstructive plaques with high-risk biological, morphological, and biomechanical features. This review summarizes contemporary concepts of plaque vulnerability, including plaque rupture, plaque erosion, and calcified nodules, and examines the role of invasive imaging and computational techniques in identifying lesions at increased risk of future events. Intravascular ultrasound, near-infrared spectroscopy, and optical coherence tomography provide complementary information on plaque burden, lipid content, fibrous cap thickness, macrophage infiltration, calcification, and thrombotic substrates. However, their routine use may be limited by cost, procedural complexity, contrast requirements, and operator dependency. Emerging angiography-derived approaches, particularly radial wall strain, offer a simplified method to assess plaque deformability and biomechanical instability from standard coronary angiography. Elevated radial wall strain has shown correlation with optical coherence tomography-defined vulnerable plaque features and independent prognostic value for adverse cardiovascular outcomes, including in non-flow-limiting lesions. Integration of coronary physiology, plaque morphology, and biomechanical indices may therefore refine lesion-level risk stratification and support a more personalized approach to coronary artery disease management. Further prospective studies are needed to determine whether vulnerability-guided diagnostic and therapeutic strategies can improve clinical outcomes beyond current anatomy- and ischaemia-based paradigms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.