ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Trends and variation in use of end-tidal carbon dioxide during in-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The American Heart Association recommends using end-tidal carbon dioxide during cardiac arrest for advanced airway confirmation and for monitoring and optimizing cardiopulmonary resuscitation; practice patterns of its use during in-hospital cardiac arrest are not well described. Methods: We used the prospectively collected get with the guidelines-resuscitation registry to characterize trends and hospital-level variation in end-tidal carbon dioxide use for airway confirmation in arrests with a newly placed airway, and to monitor cardiopulmonary resuscitation in arrests with a new or prior airway. Proportions were displayed by month from 2000 to 2023. Hospital use rates were displayed visually and calculated for contemporary practice (2019-2023). Proportions were reported using means or medians depending on the distribution. Results: Among 257,057 in-hospital cardiac arrests with a new airway, 92.6% were confirmed with end-tidal carbon dioxide in 2019-2023. Among the 554,693 in-hospital cardiac arrests with either a new airway or an airway already in place, 35.3% had end-tidal carbon dioxide applied for monitoring cardiopulmonary resuscitation in 2019-2023. There was little variation in hospital proportions for airway confirmation, with a median of 94.0%; however, a high degree of variation was observed across hospitals for monitoring cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Conclusion: End-tidal carbon dioxide application is widespread for confirming airway placement during in-hospital cardiac arrest, but gaps remain in adherence to guideline recommendations for monitoring cardiopulmonary resuscitation with end-tidal carbon dioxide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.