ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
CD3+ T-cell count prediction for anti-thymocyte globulin treatment monitorization in kidney transplant recipients: a machine learning model.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim: Antithymocyte globulin (ATG) therapy is conventionally monitored by measuring peripheral blood CD3+ T-cell counts. However, CD3+ T-cell quantification requires flow cytometry and may not be routinely available in centers. This study aimed to identify clinical and laboratory predictors of CD3+ T-cell depletion and to develop a machine learning model for predicting attainment of predefined therapeutic CD3+ T-cell thresholds following ATG induction therapy in kidney transplant recipients. Materials and methods: Adult transplant patients who underwent kidney transplantation were retrospectively evaluated. ATG doses were administered as induction therapy, and the subsequent peripheral blood CD3+ T-cell counts were obtained. Demographic, anthropometric features, and laboratory results were recorded. Statistical and machine learning methods were applied to identify parameters predictive of CD3+ T-cell counts. Prediction models were developed and compared to the logistic regression model to estimate the likelihood of reaching certain CD3+ T-cell count cut-offs after transplantation to evaluate and monitor ATG effect. Results: In the analysis of 397 transplant patients of 99.2% grafts from living donors, 57.2% of patients achieved the predefined day-1 CD3+ T-cell < 50 cell/μl threshold, while 57.5% of patients reached the predefined day-2 CD3+ T-cell < 30 cell/μl threshold. The machine learning model's performance in predicting target threshold attainment resulted in ROC-AUC values of 0.75 and 0.80 for Day 1 (test and validation sets), whereas Day 2 predictions yielded ROC-AUC scores of 0.70 and 0.66, respectively. The predictive performance of the machine learning model was superior to logistic regression prediction, and decision curve analysis showed that the model provided clinically meaningful net benefit for decision-making for Day 1 and Day 2 predictions. Conclusion: The clinical response to ATG treatment for induction immunosuppression in kidney transplant patients may be adequately predicted using low-cost and accessible laboratory tests alongside patient-specific characteristics without the need for CD3+ T-cell quantification, through machine learning prediction models. This study provides an initial framework for further development of more accurate machine learning models with higher prediction power for clinical use in ATG effect prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.