ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Differentiating effective salvage from ineffective delayed compensation in anterior circulation stroke: a dynamic quantitative collateral index.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate a deconvolution-free Dynamic Quantitative Collateral Approach based on 4D-CTA reconstructed from CTP source data, and to evaluate its prognostic value for Early Neurological Recovery (ENR) in acute anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) by differentiating effective tissue salvage from ineffective delayed perfusion. Methods: In this retrospective study of 94 patients with anterior circulation LVO, the Rapid Compensation Index (RCI), Late Compensation Index (LCI), and Total Compensation Index (TCI) were calculated based on Vessel Volume Deficit (VVD) derived from 4D-CTA reconstructed from CTP source data. Logistic regression, ROC analysis, and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) were utilized to compare the quantitative collateral indices against visual scores (Tan, rLMC, Menon) for predicting ENR (7-day ΔNIHSS ≥4). A predictive nomogram was constructed and evaluated for clinical net benefit. Results: RCI significantly predicted recovery, whereas LCI showed limited utility, objectively reflecting delayed collateral filling. TCI independently predicted ENR with high discrimination (AUC = 0.858), significantly outperforming the Tan score (AUC = 0.810, Conclusion: This dynamic approach provides an objective, deconvolution-free assessment of hemodynamic efficiency. By physiologically distinguishing functional reperfusion from ineffective delayed compensation, it demonstrates prognostic accuracy comparable to expert consensus, offering a robust tool for acute stroke triage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.