SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2026
Sexual dysfunction associated with 5α-reductase inhibitors in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: 5α-reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) are most commonly used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and androgenetic alopecia (AGA). Preclinical and clinical studies suggest that in patients with AGA treated with 5-ARIs, a subset reports sexual adverse events, including decreased libido, erectile dysfunction, and ejaculatory disorders. This review explores the development of sexual dysfunction in patients with androgenetic alopecia due to the use of 5-ARIs, emphasizing their importance in the clinical diagnosis of health disorders coexisting with hair loss. Methods: A systematic review was conducted by searching electronic databases, including MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar, according to the PRISMA guidelines. The search was limited to articles published in English and up to December 2025. Key search terms included "5α-reductase inhibitors" or "5-ARIs" or "finasteride" or "dutasteride" AND "side effects" or "sexual side effects" or "sexual" or "sexual dysfunction" AND "androgenetic alopecia" or "male pattern hair loss" or "female pattern hair loss." Data synthesis included findings from 41 studies, comprising 33 primary-evidence studies in AGA/MPHL/FPHL populations and 8 supporting-evidence studies providing pharmacokinetic, mixed-indication, or comparative context. Results: 5-ARIs are effective therapies for androgenetic alopecia and are generally well tolerated. Across placebo-controlled RCTs evaluating oral finasteride 1 mg in men with AGA, sexual adverse events were reported in 1.9-6.7% of treated patients compared with 0.9-3.9% in placebo groups, with most events mild and reversible upon discontinuation. Topical finasteride 0.25% was associated with lower rates of sexual adverse events (2.8%) compared with oral finasteride (4.8%). For dutasteride 0.5 mg, sexual adverse events ranged from 4.1 to 12.0% across RCTs, compared with 4.0-5.0% in placebo groups. No sexual adverse effects were consistently reported in women treated with 5-ARIs for AGA. In most reports, the effects were transient and reversible after discontinuation. Conclusion: Overall, clinicians should counsel patients that most sexual side effects reported in controlled AGA studies are infrequent, mild, and reversible, but individual susceptibility varies. Shared decision-making, careful monitoring of sexual function, and further high-quality long-term studies-using standardized definitions of sexual dysfunction and persistence-are needed to quantify risks better and identify vulnerable subgroups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.