ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Lesion feature enhancement and boundary-aware fusion for pulmonary embolism recognition on CT images.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To address the challenges of complex lesion representation, blurred vascular boundaries, and insufficient model generalization ability in pulmonary embolism CT images, an automatic recognition method that combines lesion feature enhancement and boundary-related structural cue fusion is proposed. Methods: An end to end pulmonary embolism recognition framework was constructed. On the basis of hierarchical visual encoding, a Pulmonary Embolus Feature Enhancement Module and a Vascular Boundary Aware Fusion Module were introduced to strengthen lesion discriminative representation and feature-level boundary-related structural modeling, respectively. Comparative experiments, ablation studies, visualization analysis, and external dataset validation were conducted to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed method in the binary classification setting. Results: On 523 single-center chest CT cases, the proposed method achieved an Accuracy of 0.956, a Precision of 0.961, a Recall of 0.951, and an AUC of 0.971, outperforming multiple comparison models in the internal evaluation. In external validation, the proposed method achieved Accuracy values of 0.779 and 0.672 on the FUMPE and RSNA datasets, respectively, indicating its potential cross-domain generalization ability in pulmonary embolism recognition. Conclusion: The proposed method can effectively improve the discriminative performance of binary pulmonary embolism recognition from CT images, and may provide a useful technical reference for computer-aided screening of pulmonary embolism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.