Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42396105›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Bridging the human-AI gap: the role of perceived teacher support in shaping EFL learners' willingness to engage in collaborative writing.

Wenting Gong, Chuang Xu, Jian-Hong Ye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wenting GongSchool of Languages and Cultures, Hunan Institute of Technology, Hengyang, Hunan, China.
Chuang XuSchool of Marxism, Hunan Institute of Technology, Hengyang, Hunan, China.
Jian-Hong YeFaculty of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collaborative writing instruction has been widely adopted in second language (L2) writing pedagogy, and the human-AI collaborative approach has recently gained increasing traction in this field. Despite the promising potential of this pedagogical model in facilitating L2 writing, the factors influencing learners' willingness to engage (WTE) in human-AI collaborative L2 writing remain underexplored. Based on the Stimulus-Organism-Response (S-O-R) model and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), this study explores how perceived teacher support contributes to EFL learners' WTE in human-AI collaborative L2 writing. A total of 503 Chinese university EFL learners with AI-aided L2 writing experience were included in this quantitative study. Findings from questionnaires and regression analyses indicate that perceived teacher support is directly and positively linked to the EFL learners' WTE. It also exerts an indirect association with WTE via the independent mediating roles of technology acceptance and task flow. Furthermore, technology acceptance and task flow jointly form a chain-mediating pathway between perceived teacher support and WTE. These findings not only broaden the application of the S-O-R model and TAM within human-AI collaborative writing contexts but also provide valuable implications for L2 writing pedagogy in AI-aided contexts.

Indexed as

Chinese EFL learnershuman-AI collaborative writingL2 writingperceived teacher supportStimuli-Organism-Response (S-O-R) frameworktask flowtechnology acceptancewillingness to engage

Identifiers

PMID42396105
PMCPMC13323247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.