Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42396104›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

The adaptive ecological trap: a grounded theory study of adolescent AI dependency.

Gaochang Gong, Guoqiang Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gaochang GongSchool of Education, Hunan University of Humanities, Science and Technology, Loudi, Hunan, China.
Guoqiang LiSchool of Education, Hunan University of Humanities, Science and Technology, Loudi, Hunan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study explores the formation mechanisms of adolescent dependency on artificial intelligence and proposes a theoretical model of the "adaptive ecological trap" to explain its dynamic evolutionary process. Methods: Employing a grounded theory approach, in-depth interviews were conducted with 38 secondary school students who frequently used generative AI, and the data were analyzed through three-level coding. Results: The results indicated that the formation of adolescent AI dependency is a systemic process that originates from gaps in real-world developmental needs and initiates compensatory use under the combined influence of technological allure and individual-environmental vulnerabilities. According to participants' accounts, this process may be perceived to erode key developmental capacities and potentially contribute to a self-reinforcing cycle. The model delineates a four-stage evolutionary pathway from adaptive use to increasingly impairing dependency: trap laying, triggering, tightening, and locking. This study emphasizes that AI dependency is not merely a behavioral addiction but an outcome of dysregulation within the individual-technology-environment ecosystem, characterized by dynamism, interactivity, and self-reinforcing properties. Discussion: The findings call for collaborative interventions involving families, schools, technology platforms, and social policies. Furthermore, measures such as filling real-world developmental gaps, enhancing individual and environmental resilience, and disrupting negative feedback loops are crucial to assist adolescents in achieving healthy, autonomous development in the digital era.

Indexed as

adaptive ecological trapadolescentsartificial intelligencegrounded theorytechnology dependency

Identifiers

PMID42396104
PMCPMC13323298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.