Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42396035›Full record

ArticleACS omega2026

Influence of Extraction Methods on the Physicochemical and Biological Properties of Amazonian Beetle Larva Oil (

Gabriel Araújo de Jesus, Allan Luiz Galvão Dickson, Vanessa Albuquerque de Mescouto, Maurílio Cunha Silva, Carmelita de Fátima Amaral Ribeiro, Carlos Emmerson Ferreira da Costa, Rodrigo Juliano Oliveira, Bruno Rafael Ribeiro de Almeida, Adauto Lima Cardoso, Renata Coelho Rodrigues Noronha and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Gabriel Araújo de JesusAmazon Oil Laboratory, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Pará (UFPA), Belém 66075-110, Brazil.
Allan Luiz Galvão DicksonAmazon Oil Laboratory, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Pará (UFPA), Belém 66075-110, Brazil.
Vanessa Albuquerque de MescoutoAmazon Oil Laboratory, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Pará (UFPA), Belém 66075-110, Brazil.
Maurílio Cunha SilvaFood Science and Technology Laboratory, State University of Pará (UEPA), Salvaterra Campus, Salvaterra 68860-000, Brazil.
Carmelita de Fátima Amaral RibeiroFood Science and Technology Laboratory, State University of Pará (UEPA), Salvaterra Campus, Salvaterra 68860-000, Brazil.
Carlos Emmerson Ferreira da CostaAmazon Oil Laboratory, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Pará (UFPA), Belém 66075-110, Brazil.
Rodrigo Juliano OliveiraCenter for Studies in Stem Cells, Cell Therapy and Toxicological Genetics, School of Medicine, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Campo Grande 79070-900, Brazil.
Bruno Rafael Ribeiro de AlmeidaDepartment of Natural Sciences, State University of Pará (UEPA), Campus XVIII, Cametá 68400-000, Brazil.
Adauto Lima CardosoGenetics and Cellular Biology Laboratory, Center for Advanced Studies of Biodiversity, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Pará (UFPA), Belém 66075-110, Brazil.
Renata Coelho Rodrigues NoronhaGenetics and Cellular Biology Laboratory, Center for Advanced Studies of Biodiversity, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Pará (UFPA), Belém 66075-110, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9150-8544
Luís Adriano Santos do NascimentoAmazon Oil Laboratory, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Pará (UFPA), Belém 66075-110, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9947-4078

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimThe Amazonian fruit EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE: Larva oil was extracted by frying (180 °C), mechanical pressing, and UAE (∼50 °C) and evaluated for yield, acidity, peroxide value, and fatty acid composition. Because the raw material showed signs of prior degradation, the study also assessed the robustness of each extraction method under compromised conditions. Biological assays included MTT-based cytotoxicity and RT-qPCR analysis of p16 and p21 expression in HaCaT and B16F10 cells, with statistical analysis performed by analysis of variance/Tukey ( RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Frying produced the highest yield (45%), while UAE yielded oil with lower acidity (8.36 mg KOH/g) and peroxide value (3.97 mequiv O CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: UAE showed the greatest preservation of the oil's physicochemical integrity and molecular stability among the evaluated methods.

Identifiers

PMID42396035
PMCPMC13325380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.