ArticleJournal of cardiology cases2026
Leadless pacemaker tine fracture resulting in device migration to the pulmonary artery: A case report.
Article in Journal of cardiology cases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 96-year-old woman underwent implantation of a leadless pacemaker (Micra™ AV2; Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) for sick sinus syndrome. One month after implantation, pacing failure due to an elevated pacing threshold was observed, and the pacing output was increased. At routine follow-up one year after implantation, recurrent pacing failure was detected. Chest radiography revealed migration of the device into the left pulmonary artery. At least two of the four fixation tines were missing from the device body, and one fractured tine remained embedded in the right ventricular myocardium. Because the patient was asymptomatic, ventricular pacing dependency was low, and considering her advanced age and comorbidities, device retrieval or reimplantation was not performed. Although leadless pacemakers reduce complications associated with conventional transvenous systems, device-specific mechanical complications have been reported. We present a rare case of tine fracture of a Micra™ AV2 device resulting in migration into the pulmonary artery. Learning objective: Tine fracture is a rare but potentially serious mechanical complication of leadless pacemakers. When pacing thresholds increase or pacing failure occurs, careful assessment of device position and fixation, including detailed imaging review, is essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.